Response: That it prospective study might possibly be fascinating, for sure, yet not for our lookup concern. In case your reviewer considers that our analyses are not suited to answer our very own research matter (not to ever most other probably fascinating research questions), we should select a clear breakdown of those recommended analyses and you will a justification in their mind. As the the latest customer has not justified this aspect and also simply described exactly what he/she’d want to see or might have accomplished by themselves/by herself, here’s need not accomplish that. What it is of your manuscript are obvious; maybe not especially committed, however, clear: examine pages and nonusers when you look at the mating orientations. The fresh new suggested research is not the that must just be sure to promote a treatment for the search concern.
Away from a mathematical viewpoint, this has been known for a lifetime one to dichotomizing parameters is not good practice (Cohen, 1983).
New SOI-R did declaration differences between everyone (expected). Yet about demonstrated regression (desk 2) the outcomes is actually unexpected towards Penke & Asendorpf (2008, p. 14). How does? Why does it look in the whole design?
Response: Once more, i have had issues to fully understand the feedback. Therefore, we do not carry out one changes from this problem.
age.grams. 222-229: The brand new dialogue and the idea is actually referring to the new motives out-of users. Yet zero intentions try assessed, but attitudes. The link anywhere between each other was forgotten in the article, please provide particular after that literary works otherwise specialize in thinking.
Response: I be sorry for not to getting agreed upon this time. Given this performing condition, i become familiar with if discover differences in mating orientations (short-term, long-term) based in the event you’re a person out of relationship software. All of our means try centered on prior browse did about this material and you will, before better of the degree, there’s no option means regarding this matter having showed to get better than the current one to. Thus, we do not perform alterations in the fresh manuscript in respect having in order to so it review.
Severe: The brand new resource away from single students is shed before (title or at least in the first 50 % of this new conceptual).
Right from the start of the manuscript, we discuss the reasons for having using matchmaking software and you to, in spite of the current label, you can use them for numerous causes, besides toward identify everyday sex
Response: Thanks a lot definitely for it opinion. Adopting the your own testimonial, i have included this dilemma in the 1st 1 / 2 of the fresh conceptual (p. dos, line twenty eight): “People was in fact 902 unmarried college students from a mid-size Language school…”. Besides that, on Users and you may Processes part, i stated: “This research is element of a bigger investment carried out in good Spanish university you to lined up to explore multiple regions of brand new sexuality regarding young students” (today, from inside the p. 6, traces 142-143). In addition, i told you “the author?s college or university” (p. seven, line 170), hence issue is pointed out from inside the study’s limits (now, when you look at the p. 15, lines 336-340).
235: “Conclusions”. Since the correlations are exhibited and you can theory checked inside a combination-sectional analysis, new text might be chosen a great deal more considerate.
Response: We have cautiously appeared so it point and we also have not been able to get any causal allege. I’ve made an effort to establish our overall performance just like the ‘differences’, ‘correlations’ or ‘associations’. However if i overlooked one causal allege, we will change it.
Making use of matchmaking software are evaluated instead delving with the sort of uses, from people who used it on a single day because the an excellent joke certainly one of family members to the people which tried it getting months looking getting a connection
Response: Thanks for your own recommendation. We have incorporated additional information about Limits point, to provide all products said of the reviewers (now inside the pp. 15-sixteen, lines 341-365):
The study possess many limits. Almost every other limits was linked to nudistfriendsprofielvoorbeelden brand new representativeness of your try and you will the latest generalization of your own results. One of several finally users, the brand new take to is mostly lady, aged between 18 and you may twenty-six, solitary and from a single college or university, deciding to make the results difficult to generalize to college students and you may, nonetheless less to more youthful low-university students.
